<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SOUL CYCLES USA BLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ridesoul.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ridesoul.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TITANIUM OR TITANIUM + CARBON by kip</title>
		<link>http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320&#038;cpage=2#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>all ti. carbon adds expense and sketchiness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all ti. carbon adds expense and sketchiness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TITANIUM OR TITANIUM + CARBON by Chad</title>
		<link>http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320&#038;cpage=1#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320#comment-4733</guid>
		<description>Maybe a Ti post would be something to consider. Once again this seems to be a product that worked well and fell to wayside when carbon fiber became more prominent. We may look into next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a Ti post would be something to consider. Once again this seems to be a product that worked well and fell to wayside when carbon fiber became more prominent. We may look into next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TITANIUM OR TITANIUM + CARBON by jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320&#038;cpage=1#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on a ti seatpost to match the bars and fork?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on a ti seatpost to match the bars and fork?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TITANIUM OR TITANIUM + CARBON by Justin McKeel</title>
		<link>http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320&#038;cpage=1#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin McKeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ridesoul.com/?p=320#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d definitely buy a Ti handlebar - OS, flat and with no more than 9 degrees of sweep. I&#039;ve had big sweep bars on my Dillinger (Carnegie&#039;s) and while they are super comfy for cruising I prefer moderate sweep on tight single track. 

Around 27&quot; wide would be good, buyers can always shorten if they prefer.

I personally will probably never ride carbon offroad - so I vote full Ti fork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d definitely buy a Ti handlebar &#8211; OS, flat and with no more than 9 degrees of sweep. I&#8217;ve had big sweep bars on my Dillinger (Carnegie&#8217;s) and while they are super comfy for cruising I prefer moderate sweep on tight single track. </p>
<p>Around 27&#8243; wide would be good, buyers can always shorten if they prefer.</p>
<p>I personally will probably never ride carbon offroad &#8211; so I vote full Ti fork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
